Welcome
Welcome to whu-au forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

End of Big Spending at West Ham

Praise, gripes, thoughts, transfer rumours, injuries, etc

Moderators: norven munky, whubris, Dave

End of Big Spending at West Ham

Postby TheRedRisky on Sat May 10, 2008 7:42 pm

C+P BBC

Beex won't like this :P


West Ham manager Alan Curbishley will be transformed from big spender to penny pincher when the summer transfer window reopens next month.

The Hammers became synonymous with spiralling wages last summer.

Blackburn defender Lucas Neill chose to move to Upton Park instead of Anfield after Liverpool baulked at the salary the Hammers had agreed to pay, while the likes of Freddie Ljungberg, Kieron Dyer and Craig Bellamy all arrived on bumper pay packets.

This recruiting spree has resulted in West Ham boasting one of the biggest first-team squads in the Premier League and a wage bill approaching £50m a year.

When you consider that their turnover for the 2006/7 season was £57.3m, you can see that the Hammers are some distance from achieving chairman Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson's target of being "self sustaining".

So this summer will be very different from those heady days of last year.

A senior source at the club has told BBC Sport that Curbishley, who was appointed in December 2006, will still be in charge at the start of next season.

But the 50-year-old will be charged with trimming the wage bill and selling players before he buys new ones.

"Mr Gudmundsson is used to looking at long-term factors and knows you don't judge a manager in any business after 18 months," the source said.

"Now is a time to stabilise, because we are convinced that success comes through stability. The ratio between wages and turnover is too high at the moment.

"We have probably the biggest first-team squad in the Premiership and our transfer strategy has to be carefully planned going forward.

"West Ham have a first-team squad of 40, so there is considerable room for manoeuvre. The last thing you should do when you have a problem is to throw money at it."

The source insists this new frugality is not the result of Gudmundsson facing financial difficulties of his own.

The 67-year-old is the owner of Iceland's biggest bank, Landsbanki, and the country is facing severe economic problems, with a collapsing currency, rising inflation, double-digit interest rates and predictions of its first recession since 1992.

"Lansbanki is still running with considerable, healthy profits," the source insisted.


Gudmundsson is determined to improve medical and training facilities

"Gudmundsson also has interests in several other companies and they are doing well. In the Forbes rich list last April he was the second wealthiest man in Iceland (behind his son) and one of the 1,000 richest men in the world.

"We finalised the financial arrangements of West Ham before the credit crisis hit and the club is on a very stable footing. That financial framework hasn't changed a bit."

The Hammers are now focusing on bringing through their own players, with Freddie Sears and James Tomkins already having impressed for the first team this season.

And Gudmundsson is determined to improve the club's medical and training facilities, after being alarmed at the number of injuries suffered by players like Craig Bellamy, Matthew Upson and Dyer.

"The medical and training facilities are better than those at a lot of other Premier League clubs but not as good as AC Milan's, which is the level we are aiming for," the source said.

Work is expected to start on a new training ground midway through next season, which will replace the ageing facilities at Chadwell Heath.

The club has also changed its management structure, with Gudmundsson taking sole control of the club as chairman following the enforced departure of Eggert Magnusson in December.

Gudmundsson's trusted lieutenant, Asgeir Fridgeirsson, has moved onto the board as vice-chairman, chief executive Scott Duxbury is responsible for the day-to-day running of the club and technical director Gianluca Nani is charged with recruiting the world's best young talent.

When Gudmundsson bought the Hammers, he laid out a five-year plan which, he hoped, would ultimately culminate in qualification for the Champions League.

He believes the club is still on course for that ambition and next season's target will be to challenge for a Uefa Cup spot.

But with his cheque book being put into cold storage, Curbishley has a very different task on his hands than he did at the start of last summer.
Image
User avatar
TheRedRisky
Trevor Brooking (1000+)
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby xloserfishx on Sat May 10, 2008 9:15 pm

Get back to work slacker!
Image
User avatar
xloserfishx
First team regular (300+)
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:20 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Dave on Sat May 10, 2008 9:23 pm

So things are exactly the same as when we had Terry Brown then. FFS - we're kidding ourselves if we think things will ever change at West Ham.
User avatar
Dave
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1320
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:52 am
Location: Brisbane

Postby Westham5096 on Sat May 10, 2008 11:33 pm

Im sorry but im of the opinion that you have to spend money to make money.Surely to make the BIG BUCKS we have to be in Europe and we are still a couple of players away from seriously being able to challenge for the Champions League or even the EUFA Cup.

Donot have a problem with us getting rid of some excess dead wood but in doing so Curbs had better be given the money to try to purchase players that would fill our shortcomings (and there are some obvious ones).

Have to agree with Dave here it really sounds like WESTHAM of old and nothing will change.The board want us to challenge for Europe on a SHOESTRING budget (it WILL NOT happen).

The biggest contradiction for me is that we are relying on Nani to bring in young Talent,surely to get this young talent to the Hammers you have to pay for it,but it seems we will not be doing it,so the young talent would come to us WHY?????????????

Once again im becoming VERY DISILLUSIONED with the HAMMERS heirachy. :( :( :( :(
User avatar
Westham5096
State Event Organiser
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia

Postby beggers on Sun May 11, 2008 8:23 am

Yeah this is same, same to me. Like Paul, I've no problem with reducing a sqaud of 40 down to size, but you still need to bring in some quality if you want to progress. And Nani? why indeed.
FRANCO ZOLA'S CLARET AND BLUE ARMY........
User avatar
beggers
Moderator
 
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 4:37 pm
Location: Mermaid Beach, Gold Coast

Re: End of Big Spending at West Ham

Postby beex on Sun May 11, 2008 9:36 am

TheRedRisky wrote:C+P BBC
Beex won't like this :P


erm, apparently this piece is almost word for word what Scott Duxbury said awhile ago. Not to be trusted although I'm all for trimming the fat of the squad but I reckon start from the top down with Curbs and Merv and his bunch of injury inducing physios :P
Some people think football is a matter of life or death, but it's far more important than that.
User avatar
beex
Moderator
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to General West Ham Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests